Bot  

search:

fast-breaking news analysis about drug policy and illegal drugs

Your Enslavement in the Matrix
five star (video)

Prison for Profit
The Rise of the Prison Industrial Complex
Prison Profiteers (2013)


Here

home   about

MAP scholar

propaganda news

canada uk

australia pot news

psychedelics news

tag cloud topics

concept dictionary

feeds   stats

user analysis

contact us   faq   chat

login register


Mapinc

news hawking!

latest

drugnews

DrugSense

A Drug War Carol

No Victim/No Crime - fija.org

Need facts? See: DrugWarFacts.org

this bot site is Hosted By DrugPolicyCentral! ... Please help us keep going!

This newsbot site, while automated (true!) has always depended on the generosity of volunteers and visitors to keep it up and running. If this site has helped you, and you can afford to help us, then we ask you to give generously. And to those who have been helping to keep us running, a heartfelt THANK YOU!       Donate online: click here and help us out!

US: Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg for $14 million gets a property tax surprise -- Press Enterprise

Found: Wed Oct 09 14:11:13 2019 PDT
Source: Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA)
Copyright: 2019 The Press-Enterprise Company
Contact: http://www.pe.com/localnews/opinion/letters_form.html
Website: http://www.pe.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/830
Webpage: https://www.pe.com/2019/10/09/couple-who-s... [translate]
Author: About $, moderator@scng.com
Newshawk: http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/


topical analysis
prison was NOT mentioned
propaganda analysis

Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg for $14 million gets a property tax surprise -- Press Enterprise Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg for $14 million gets a property tax surprise -- Press Enterprise * News * News

* Crime + Public Safety

* Investigative Reporting

* Politics

* Health

* Place an Obituary

* Opinion * Opinion

* SUBSCRIBE NOW

GET BREAKING NEWS IN YOUR BROWSER. CLICK HERE TO TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS.

X

* Sign Up For Newsletters

* E-edition

Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg...

Share this:

* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

* Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

* Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

* Click to print (Opens in new window)

Trending: * Rehab center raids

* Fight turns deadly

Housing

Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg for $14 million gets a property tax surprise

The Shulmans thought their move from Palo Alto to Atherton would be covered by Prop 90

Share this:

* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

* Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

* Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

* Click to print (Opens in new window)

1459 Hamilton Ave., in Palo Alto, shown on Tuesday, Sept. 20, 2016, is one of four homes that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wants to demolish and rebuild in a smaller size around his own home. (Norbert von der Groeben / Daily News)

Ron and Ellen Shulman were perfectly happy in their Palo Alto home of nearly 20 years. But when a company controlled by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said it would pay $14 million for the property, the offer was too good to pass up.

It was a classic Silicon Valley real estate dream come true. They had paid a fraction of that for the house.

So, the Shulmans packed up and headed for tony Atherton, eventually settling into a home assessed at just under $7 million. The couple planned to use a state law that allows residents over age 55 to transfer their property taxes, in this case from the Palo Alto home to the new house in Atherton, without increasing their tax payment.

Because they had purchased the Palo Alto house for little more than $1 million in 1995, what's known as the base year value had risen to just $1.7 million, a huge figure in most real estate markets, but relatively modest on the Peninsula. They paid less than $20,000 a year in property taxes. The state law, Prop. 90, allows people who move from one of a few participating counties to another to keep their old property tax as long as their new home is of equal or lesser value than their old residence.

But based on an assessment of their Palo Alto home, the Shulmans' request was denied. Their property taxes rose to around $80,000, more than most Americans make in a year.

Now, they've spent years embroiled in a bitter and costly multi-county tax dispute that has resulted in a lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court over how much a property is really worth and who gets to decide.

"It's very frustrating and troubling," said Ron Shulman, a patent trial lawyer, adding that the couple had deliberately kept their new home within what they thought would be the confines of Prop. 90 to avoid incurring extra tax costs. "We seem to have done everything by the book the way it should be done."

Their story began in 2013, when the Shulmans sold their home on Hamilton Avenue in Santa Clara County to RFBPO, a Zuckerberg-owned LLC. The Zuckerbergs bought up four properties, including the Shulman's, around their Palo Alto home after learning that a developer planned to build a home next door that would be tall enough to see into the Facebook CEO's master bedroom.

The Shulmans purchased property in Atherton in San Mateo County and built a new home on it by 2015, within the two-year time frame Prop. 90 requires. San Mateo County assessed the new property at about $6.8 million. But when the couple applied for Prop. 90 approval in San Mateo County, they were denied. That's because Santa Clara County had assessed the value of their old residence at just $4.9 million, a fraction of the sales price. And that put their new place well above the required threshold allowed for a property tax transfer -- 110 percent of the old home's assessed value.

With the denial of the transfer, the Shulman's say their property taxes rose by about $60,000.

Shocked at what they and their attorneys characterize as the "arbitrarily low assessment of the original residence's value," the Shulmans asked San Mateo County, where they now pay property taxes, to review the issue. But San Mateo County demurred, saying it couldn't adjust a valuation from another county.

"We don't really know why we're part of this lawsuit," said San Mateo Deputy County Counsel Rebecca Archer.

But according to David Ginsborg, deputy assessor for Santa Clara County, the $4.9 million assessment is fair.

"Just because there's a transaction," Ginsborg said, "a transaction doesn't determine the market."

When the Shulmans tried to go to Santa Clara County to review the assessment documents, they were denied access since they no longer owned the property. And when the pair asked RFBPO to give them access to the documents, the company declined. An attorney representing RFBPO declined to comment. But if the county were to reassess the property at a higher value, the Zuckerbergs could face higher taxes.

Feeling stuck, the couple filed an appeal in San Mateo County. The appeals board again said the county couldn't do anything and pointed them toward Santa Clara County. But the Shulmans have argued that they can't file an appeal there because the appeals process is for people who own or pay taxes on a property in the county. They no longer do either.

"This is truly living life between a rock and a hard place," reads the Shulman's suit against the two counties and the LLC.

The Shulmans say they've been denied due process and want the court to ask Santa Clara County to revalue the property. The $14 million sales price on their Palo Alto home, they said, is what the market supported.

"Everybody's pointing a finger at everybody else," Shulman said. "We feel like we're in a bureaucratic nightmare."

The assessor's office, Ginsborg said, is required to look at everything from location and square footage to amenities and home quality and ask, essentially, "What would a normal buyer pay for this home?"

But the Shulmans and their legal team say the county didn't fully take into account the roughly $3 million complete remodel of the Palo Alto house they did a few years before they sold it, or the fact that other homes in the neighborhood had also sold for more than $10 million. And, they said, an independent appraisal they requested said the property was worth about $6.7 million, within the 110 percent value of their new home allowed under Prop 90. So, they argued, even if the county declined to assess the property at $14 million, it should have been much more than $4.9 million.

If the county used the $14 million figure, the property would funnel well over $100,000 toward Santa Clara County.

"The Santa Clara County school system is going wanting for $100,000 every year and an elderly couple is being surcharged more than $50,000 every year as a result of the county's arbitrary assessments," said Paul Barulich, an attorney representing the Shulmans, who are both in their mid-60s.

Ginsborg, who said he is friends with the Shulman's son, pushed back at that notion.

"The public wants us to adhere to an independent standard so that when it's their turn, they know they're getting a fair shake," Ginsborg said.

Related Articles * Feds sue operator of real estate seminars endorsed by ‘Flip or Flop' TV stars

* California in-law units could be cheaper, easier to build under new bills

* Status Update: Inland tech firms part of $2.9 million in state grants

* Solving L.A.'s homelessness problem would cost $2.5 billion

* Cut out the broker, save 6%! Well, maybe not

Almost a decade ago, he noted, Israeli-Russian tycoon Yuri Milner broke records when he paid an eye-popping $100 million for a Los Altos Hills home. But the assessor's office valued the home at just half that, $50 million, analyzing comparable properties as far away as Los Angeles to arrive at a value.

Patricia Cain, a tax law professor at Santa Clara University who is not involved in the case, said the county's appraisal of the Shulman's old property "seems outrageous to meThat just doesn't happen in the real world."

The parties in the suit are expected to meet later this fall to discuss the case.

Shulman, who plans to retire within the next couple of years, wants what has become a time-consuming headache resolved.

"Had I known," he said, "we never would've done this."

Get the latest news delivered daily! Subscribe

Follow Us * Facebook

* Twitter

* Instagram

* RSS

Most Popular * Just a few more days left to experience the original Salted Pig; it closes Sunday, Oct. 13

* The new $35.2 million Cahuilla Casino Hotel is under construction, will replace the old hotel in 2020

* 9 acts you must see at Desert Daze at Lake Perris this weekend

* Moreno Valley classroom fight, bullying dominate school board meeting

* 15 Freeway ramps at Nichols Road in Lake Elsinore to close Wednesday, Oct. 9

* 91 Freeway ramp closures set at three Riverside exits over the next three weeks

* Couple that sold their home to Mark Zuckerberg for $14 million gets a property tax surprise

* Map: Where are the PG&E shutdowns, and when will the power come back?

* 84-year-old Hemet man arrested on suspicion of fatally shooting his son

* Man arrested after fatal shooting of tow truck driver in Riverside

* Union Pacific's historic Big Boy locomotive is stopping in Colton. Here's how to check it out

* Strong Santa Ana winds bringing extreme wildfire risks this week

* Tags:

* housing

View Comments

Join the Conversation

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.

If you see comments that you find offensive, please use the "Flag as Inappropriate" feature by hovering over the right side of the post, and pulling down on the arrow that appears. Or, contact our editors by emailing moderator@scng.com.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More in Housing *

Newsom signs AB 1482, capping rent hikes across California

Bubble Watch: Do these economic trends spook you?

With California's high power rates, will all-electric homes be affordable?

Feds sue operator of real estate seminars endorsed by ‘Flip or Flop' TV stars

* Live Traffic Map

* Corrections

analysis of article text


prohibitionist hits:0 government drug warrior (prohibition_agency) hits:0 propaganda (drugwar_propaganda) hits:14 legalization hits:0 drug_reformer hits:0 reform_referenda hits:0 cannabis hits:0 stimulant hits:0 narcotic hits:0 hallucinogen hits:0
    prohibitionist     prohibition_agency     drugwar_propaganda     legalization     drug_reformer
    reform_referenda     cannabis     stimulant     narcotic     hallucinogen
                        
                        


incarceration/prison mentioned? NO - the issue of prison or incarceration was NOT mentioned in this article .

propaganda analysis


explicit prohibition propaganda (explicit_propaganda) hits:2 hated group (propaganda_theme1) hits:0 madness, violence, illness (propaganda_theme2) hits:8 survival of society (propaganda_theme3) hits:4 gateway, use is abuse (propaganda_theme4) hits:0 children (propaganda_theme5) hits:0 demonize, war, epidemic (propaganda_theme6) hits:0 total prohibition (propaganda_theme7) hits:0 dissent opposed (propaganda_theme8) hits:0
EXP - explicit prohibition propaganda (explicit_propaganda) GRP - hated group (propaganda_theme1) MAD - madness, violence, illness (propaganda_theme2)
SOC - survival of society (propaganda_theme3) USE - gateway, use is abuse (propaganda_theme4) KID - children (propaganda_theme5)
WAR - demonize, war, epidemic (propaganda_theme6) TOT - total prohibition (propaganda_theme7) DIS - dissent opposed (propaganda_theme8)



conceptevidencehitslinks
 drug of abuse implied / mentioned

drug related 50%
[news] [concept]

drug ngo  
drugwar_propaganda : a drug war propaganda event, campaign release, slogan, or themepropaganda

drugwar propaganda 80%
[news] [concept]

explicit propaganda propaganda theme2 propaganda theme3 Why Are Americans So Easy to Manipulate? (Bruce E Levine, 2012)
Classic Modern Drug Propaganda
Themes in Chemical Prohibition
Drug War Propaganda (kindle edition)
explicit_propaganda : an explicit drug war propaganda event, campaign release, slogan, system, or programexplicit prohibition propaganda

explicit propaganda 60%
[news] [concept]

"seminars"2SourceWatch: War on Drugs
dare.procon.org
Write What You're Told
Anti-Drug PSAs From the 80s and 90s
Lippmann, Walter; Public Opinion (1921)
Bernays, Edward; Propaganda (1928)
propaganda_theme2 : drug war propaganda theme: madness, violence, illness caused by drugsmadness, violence, illness

propaganda theme2 80%
[news] [concept]

"Crime" "Inappropriate" "deadly" "fatally" "fatal" "threatening" "problem" "nightmare"8Madness Crime Violence Illness (propaganda theme 2)
drugwarfacts.org/crime.htm
drugwarfacts.org/causes.htm
Distortion 18: Cannabis and Mental Illness
No, marijuana use doesn't lower your IQ (10/2014)
propaganda_theme3 : drug war propaganda theme: survival of societysurvival of society

propaganda theme3 75%
[news] [concept]

"Americans" "community" "neighborhood" "Public Safety"4Survival of Society (propaganda theme 3)
The "Nation" as a Device To Create a Psychological Crowd
 drug ngo 50%
[news] [concept]
drug reform ngo  
 drug reform ngo 50%
[news] [concept]
ramp Mapinc.org Drug Reform Organization link database
 ramp 50%
[news] [concept]
"ramp"1rampgop.org/
 school
[news] [concept]
"school" "University"3ssdp.org/

st:0.01 fo:0 s:0.01 d:0 c:0 db:0.149 a:0.77 m:0.1 t:1.24 (f)


text of article used for CRITICAL ANALYSIS, under FAIR USE provisions of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, et al.


media charts

Bot's analysis of: "The Dangers and Consequences of Marijuana Abuse" the U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Demand Reduction Section, May 2014
more >>


Newsbot crossword puzzles!

Drug War
Propaganda

A review and analysis of modern prohibition rhetoric

  • Amazon Kindle
  • html (free)
  • pdf (free)
  •   Wonder Drug Cover-Up: Yes, it's true: pot fights cancer. more

    As Bad For Your Lungs As Smoking 20 Normal Cigarettes? 20 times more likely to cause cancer than tobacco? Why does the US Government make cannabis researchers use only Government-issued marijuana?

     
     

    Observer's Propaganda Picks
    dripping with drug-war propaganda!


    Prohibition-era cartoons
    Anti-prohibition political cartoons from Prohibition I.

     
      Support Mapinc & Drugsense

    Donate to drugsense please give generously!




    article tags



     

    school concept
    ramp concept - Republicans Against Marijuana Prohibition (RAMP)
    drug_reform_ngo concept - drug policy reform organization
    drug_ngo concept
    propaganda_theme3 concept - drug war propaganda theme: survival of society
    propaganda_theme3
    propaganda_theme2 concept - drug war propaganda theme: madness, violence, illness caused by drugs
    propaganda_theme2
    explicit_propaganda concept - an explicit drug war propaganda event, campaign release, slogan, system, or program
    explicit_propaganda
    drugwar_propaganda concept - a drug war propaganda event, campaign release, slogan, or theme
    drugwar_propaganda
    drug_related concept - related to illegal drugs and prohibition