| | United States: A weed by any other name smells the same 
Pubdate: Sun Dec 15 16:51:32 2002Source: Christian Science Monitor (US)
 Contact: oped@csps.com
 Copyright: 2002 The Christian Science Publishing Society
 Website: http://www.csmonitor.com/
 Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/83
 Webpage: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1216/p09s01-... [translate]
 Newshawk: Bot :-]
 
 |  | 
 [ topical analysis ]    propaganda analysisScience Tidbits
 
Monitorblog 
 
A weblog about technology and its impact on our lives. 
 
Liblog 
 
Our staff librarians' weblog about informative and 
interesting web sites 
 
Commentary Stories: 
 
for 12/16/2002 
 
Lott's of Concern 
 
A Cardinal Point 
 
A weed by any other name smells the same 
 
Our fractured response to Lott 
 
Assessing the form, impact, of looming tax package 
 
Letters to the Editor 
 
In Alaska's Tongass forest, a new battle over logging 
 
The Bush administration is working to increase timber 
sales and build new logging roads in America's 
rainforest. 
 
Commentary > Opinion 
 
from the December 16, 2002 edition 
 
A weed by any other name smells the same 
 
By Jim McDonough 
 
TALLAHASSEE – Big excitement has hit the drug 
legalization world. A recent RAND Drug Policy Research 
Center study reported that marijuana may look, act, and 
smell like a gateway drug to abuse of harder drugs, but 
that possibly it is not a gateway drug after all. 
 
The marijuana normalizers - as in, "let's make 
marijuana use normal, or acceptable" - loved it; so did 
some of the press. Both were quick to misportray the 
study, so much so that the author of the study himself 
was dismayed. 
 
E-mail this story 
 
Write a letter to the Editor 
 
Printer-friendly version 
 
Related stories: 
 
Drugs take root in rural America 
 
monitortalk: 
 
Your opinion matters in our online discussion forums. 
 
Share your views. 
 
Andrew Morral of RAND believes he did everything he 
could to explain he did not disprove the gateway theory 
but, as he told me, "The story about it misrepresented 
both our findings and my comments about the relevance 
of our findings to US drug policy. RAND and I have 
taken pains to emphasize that we do not believe we have 
disproved the gateway theory." 
 
The study did say that a high incidence of progression 
from marijuana to heroin and cocaine use is apparent; 
that the younger you are when you start using 
marijuana, the more likely you are to end up using 
cocaine and heroin; that the more often you use 
marijuana, the more likely you will use cocaine and 
heroin. 
 
In short, the study shows the correlation between 
marijuana and other drug abuse to be high. 
 
Indeed, the study accepts previous studies that have 
demonstrated the probability that heroin and cocaine 
use increases 85 times for marijuana users when 
compared with those who are not marijuana users; that 
early teen use of marijuana is even more highly 
correlated with other drug use than late teen marijuana 
use; and that the more puffs of marijuana you take, the 
more likely you move on to injections and snorting of 
even more dangerous drugs. 
 
But here's where the misunderstanding begins. The study 
says that maybe these terrible things happen because 
the people who use all these nasty drugs do it because 
they have a propensity for drug use, and marijuana is 
the first illegal drug to present itself to the young. 
 
Dr. Morral calls that the "common factor" theory. 
 
In other words, all drug users like all drugs; 
marijuana just comes along first. He suggests that this 
theory might be more accurate than the gateway theory. 
 
But is a gateway not a gateway because it happens to 
present itself in front of where you want to go? 
 
Perhaps this study's findings appear trivial. They 
aren't. If marijuana is merely the door through which 
those inclined to use drugs pass because it is 
convenient, all the more reason to keep that door 
locked. 
 
I'm convinced that's the best way to view Morrall's 
findings, because the pro-marijuana lobby and much of 
what the press missed in this study, as well as other 
careful studies, were findings that suggest: 
 
• There is a strong correlation between marijuana 
and other drug abuse, with marijuana almost always 
occurring first. 
 
• Marijuana, all by itself, is a dangerous drug. 
 
• There is a strong correlation between marijuana 
use and schizophrenia. 
 
• Marijuana itself is addictive. 
 
• Youth marijuana use correlates highly with 
violence, truancy, and other behavioral problems. 
 
• The younger the marijuana user, the more 
psychological and physiological damage done, and the 
more likely that other drugs will follow. 
 
• Smoking three marijuana joints a day can cause 
the equivalent respiratory damage associated with 20 
cigarettes a day. Marijuana smokers show significantly 
more respiratory symptoms than people who don't smoke 
it. 
 
• Prolonged use can cause attention deficit and 
deterioration in memory. 
 
Over the years, I have talked with hundreds of addicts 
and treatment counselors. They say that marijuana was 
virtually always the beginning of a long, ugly journey; 
that marijuana is the most insidious of the illegal 
drugs because of the seductive, but often wrong, 
rationale that you can quit any time you want; that 
easy access to marijuana is a major part of the 
problem; and that their lives would have been far 
better if marijuana had been out of the picture. 
 
As we do more studies, we might turn to these people 
for insight. 
 
So what of the utility of the "common factor" theory 
over the "gateway" theory? A weed by any other name 
still smells the same. 
 
• Jim McDonough is director of the Florida Office 
of Drug Control. He previously served as director of 
strategic planning at the Office of National Drug 
Control Policy. 
 
E-mail this story 
 
Write a letter to 
 
the Editor 
 
Printer-friendly 
 
version 
 
back to top 
 
Make a donation 
 
The Monitor's 
 
How will you spread holiday cheer?Gifts Sure to Please 
 
Holiday Festivities 
 
Toys that Teach 
 
Gourmet Gifts 
 
Unique Gifts from Around the World 
 
New! Purchase articles from the Monitor Archive for as 
little as 15 cents each. 
 
New! Subscribe to the Treeless Edition! 
 
Print editions:Daily-US onlyWeekly-outside USGift 
subscriptionSchool programsFree sample 
 
Free sample issue 
 
PDA edition 
 I thought this page was interesting because:
 
 as .txt file |