|
|
Themes in Chemical Prohibition: Sec 4
NIDA: Themes in Chemical Prohibition, William L. White, 1979
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/ticp.html
4.
The Concept of "Controlled" Usage is Destroyed and
Replaced by a "Domino [aka Stepping-Stone/Gateway] Theory" of
Chemical Progression
[All Use Is Abuse]
The history of prohibitionist pronouncements is replete with
| |
This anti-drug ad illustrates the
theme of the gateway. Taking illegal methamphetamines
"even once" leads to smoking meth, which leads
to injecting meth, and so on.
("That Guy", Montana Meth Project)
|
examples which propose a "domino [gateway] theory" of
chemical usage. Such a theory holds that the use of a particular
drug (usually the one presently targeted for prohibition)
inevitably and with rare exception leads-to the use of other
drugs (usually drugs already prohibited or drugs already defined
as evil). For example, the publication in 1798 of
Essays, Literary, Moral and Philosophical by Benjamin Rush
includes the following comments from an anti-tobacco essay: "A desire of
course is excited for strong drink, (by smoking tobacco) and
these (cigarettes) when taken between meals soon lead to
intemperance and drunkenness.35 The following
is from a 1912 article in Century magazine:
The relation of tobacco, especially in the form of
cigarettes, and alcohol and opium is a close one . . .
Morphine is the legitimate consequence of alcohol, and alcohol
is the legitimate consequence of tobacco. Cigarettes, drink,
opium is the logical and regular series.
36
One of the most dramatic and all-inclusive examples of this
"domino theory" can be seen in the following
illustration from The Temperance Program (1915) of Evangelist
Thos. F. Hubbard. 37
The contention that alcohol abuse was the basis for
morphinism was not uncommon in the late 1800's, and more
recently
the mystical connection between marihuana and heroin
has been central to the rationale for continued prohibition of
marihuana.
[All Use Is Abuse]
The destruction of the concept of controlled drug usage
implies that everyone who ever uses heroin will be a "dope
fiend," everyone who drinks will be an alcoholic, etc.
In
general this strategy equates the use and abuse of drugs and
implies that it is impossible to use the particular drug or
drugs in question without physical, mental, and moral
deterioration. Such a view holds that there are powers within
the drug over which no one can exert control.
The extreme
absurdity of such a view seems apparent when one considers the
vast majority of persons who use alcohol in this country with
minimal or no dysfunctional consequences and the numbers of
users of illicit drugs who do not suffer physical deterioration,
who do not progress to compulsive drug usage, who do continue to
work, raise children, and maintain the usually expected social
responsibilities.
The idea that there are overwhelming powers
within drugs is probably nowhere better illustrated than in a
statement in
Marc Olden's
1973 book, Cocaine,
in which he
states: "It's possible to get a habit just from handling
the drug."38 The continued belief in this domino theory of
chemical progression and its implications for current policies
is perhaps well illustrated by a 1974 survey in which 39 percent
of non-marihuana users in the sample cited
"marijuana use leads to harder drugs"
as the primary reason
for their opposition to legalization of marihuana.39
Teen-Age Booby Trap (Comic Book from the US
Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs, circa 1970)
|
|
breaking news items showing this theme
book: Drug War Propaganda
thesaurus entry (concept)
[previous]
[up]
[next]
[docuent mirrored from
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/ticp.html
emphasis, bracketed comments, some illustrations are added]
|
|
mp3 podcast  Pot News by Bot! 7am 12pm 5pm 11pm PT Chemical, plant & pharm names compatible with EROWID Drug War Propaganda A review and analysis of modern drug war propaganda. (2003, Cafepress. 324 pages)
| |
Wonder Drug Cover-Up: Yes, it's true: pot fights cancer.
more
As Bad For Your Lungs As Smoking 20 Normal Cigarettes? Why does the US Government make cannabis researchers use only Government-issued marijuana?
|
|
|
| |
| |
Support Mapinc & Drugsense
|
|
Donate to drugsense please give generously!
|
| |
|